Geometry of the great Pyramid (cont.)
By Nick Kollerstrom Phd
Flinders Petrie proposed that the adjacent 'Khafre' pyramid at Giza had its slope angle defined by the 345 triangle (3). Wikipedia cites this mean slope angle as 53°10', and arcsin (4/5) = 53° 8' (i.e., the angle whose sine is 0.8)  so this modern estimate of the mean slope angle of 'Khafre' lies within a couple of arcminutes of that 345 triangle baseangle.
The third Giza pyramid of 'Menkaure' has a slope angle estimated as 51° 20' (again, from Wikipedia) much closer to the 1/7^{th} angle, which is 51° 25'. The three Giza pyramid slope angles seem to cluster around this value. The significance of this angle is confirmed by the way the ascending and descending passages of the Great Pyramid each form just half of that angle to the horizontal, so that there is a 1/7^{th} angle between them. (4)
Summarising, the sublime geometry of this building integrates л and Φ as follows: its height is the radius of a circle whose circumference equals the base perimeter, and its height is the side of a square whose area equals that of each of the four sides.
The 'Seked'
Pythagoras' theorem was used in defining the Great Pyramid geometry, the earliest record of its use, but this is ignored or dismissed in histories of mathematics. The philosophical meaning of the coming together of the two transcendental terms pi and phi in the Giza slope angle is well discussed in John Ivimy's The Sphinx and the Megaliths (1974). A slope angle as defined by a 3:4:5 triangle (Khafre) is something you or I might dream up, whereas the pi/phi concordance and the oneseventh slope angle of the Great pyramid seems more, kind of  divine.
Ancient Egyptian texts lack any concept of an angle, but do have the 'seked.' This seked was a ratio, that between half the baseside of a pyramid and its height. That is the cotangent of our angle 'A': thus the 'seked' of the Great Pyramid was л/4, while that of the adjacent Khafre pyramid was 3/4. (5) Wonderfully, this Seked value of the Great Pyramid is equal to
1  1/3 + 1/5 1/7 + 1/9  1/11… etc.
a series which goes on forever, using all the odd numbers (Leibniz found it in 1674).
'Herodotus wrote that the pyramid was built so that the area of each lateral face would equal the area of a square that had one side as long as the pyramid was tall.' (6) Whether Herodotus ever wrote such a thing seems doubtful (7), but that remark is widely quoted! This gives us the ratio pyramid height / half baselength equal to √Φ. (8) The 'Seked' (i.e., cotA, as in (5) and (6) above) here equals 1/√Φ.
Maybe ThothHermes understood these things, long ago.
Notes:
