Plato's Mistake (cont.)
By Nick Kollerstrom, PhD
Postscript
The book The Measure
of Albion, the Lost Science of Prehistoric Britain by
Robin Heath & John Michell (2004) has the basic length-measures
of different cultures in antiquity all derive from one value of the
Earth’s circumference, which they give as 24,883.2 miles (pp.
6, 12, 20 etc) and they called that the ‘Meridian
circumference’. (By that term they meant a Great circle passing
through the poles, which I don’t believe it ever was). They
obtained the number from Michell’s earlier work Ancient
Metrology, where it’s given as the fifth power of 12. Wiki
gave 24,880 miles as a modern, mean Earth-circumference,
so it’s as close as makes no difference.
Let’s write the
(rather mystic-looking) equations, as John Michell saw them:
Mean
Earth-circumference = 125/10 miles = 604 x10
Greek feet.
That works as exactly
as can be ascertained by the figures. From that ratio there follows
John Michell’s insight [11] that
English
mile / Greek mile = Greek mile / Roman mile = 25 / 24
It just tumbles out of
the maths so to speak; bearing in mind that the Greek & Roman
miles had 5000 feet whereas the English mile had 5280 feet. The ratio
linking Greek and Roman feet or miles by 25:24 is well-established
and was accepted by ancient sources; whereas that linking the English
and Greek miles is not, and seemingly has no business to exist. After
all, it was the Roman and not the Greek mile that was introduced into
Britain and there was ‘no trace of the Olympic foot in Northern
Europe’ [12].
By Nick Kollerstrom, MA
Cantab., PhD, FRAS (for other articles by NK, see here)
Endnotes
|